"President Bush claimed that what is interesting about being President is
that he does not have to answer to anyone. Not the American people and not
Congress; not even the courts. He claimed that he is accountable to no one; that
the 2000 and 2004 elections, as marred with irregularities as they were, were
his sole moments of accountability. President Bush even claimed that it would be
a lot easier to rule as a dictator. The President of the United States of
America dared utter these words. Of course he also utters the words “freedom,”
“human rights,” and “democracy” at will to prompt the instinctive American
response that this is what our nation embodies. He espouses this belief in the
founding principles of our nation, while demonstrating a callous disregard for
the American people and our system of governance. No law is too large or too
small to undo, whether by Congress, misuse of signing statements or by complete
disregard for the law itself. What is more shocking, as many nations throughout
history have had the wrong leader at the wrong time, is the near silence from
Congress beyond a few choice quotes when an election is near. They are quite
nearly responding with one voice and one vision – Democrats and Republicans
alike. The loyal opposition in Congress is fading without debate, and many are
complicit in the overhaul of our nation. What the President says goes, checked
by none. This is the new law of 21st century America." By
Susan Morrison
"If the president has commander-in-chief power to commit torture, he has
the power to commit genocide, to sanction slavery, to promote apartheid, to
license summary execution" Harold Koh, dean of Yale Law School.
"Legally, there are no significant differences between the investor fraud
perpetrated by Enron CEO Ken Lay and the prewar intelligence fraud perpetrated
by George W. Bush. Both involved persons in authority who used half-truths and
recklessly false statements to manipulate people who trusted them. There is,
however, a practical difference: The presidential fraud is wider in scope and
far graver in its consequences than the Enron fraud. Yet thus far the public
seems paralyzed." Elizabeth de la Vega
Republicans, backed by the corporate elite, were responsible
for electing Bush. The Bush years were
disastrous for the US on almost every criteria. Thomas Frank wrote
about it in
The Wrecking Crew.
Russ Baker in his book, "Family of Secrets",
asks...how is it that W , who had an
unimpressive record of accomplishment, became President
? Like other books that do not reflect the official story,
Baker's
book got scathing reviews, but his notes are extensive and his
publisher is first class.
Bush was not particularly
well qualified to be President. He is not a very good
speaker, has little
interest in policy, had traveled little, had almost no military experience, and had
a mediocre record in the private sector. As the
son of a former President who
was the head of the CIA, his placement in office not only created massive
conflicts of interest (see the Carlyle
Group), but allowed Bush the younger to shroud his father's records in
secrecy. It
is not surprising that his record as President is the
worst
ever.
Bush Sr as a former head of the
CIA was accomplished in techniques for winning
elections, and of course had major connections to
the oil industry and US military/industrial/media complex. The Bush
family,
as Kevin Phillips
writes at length, has a tradition of putting its own interests first.
Bush Jrs selection highlighted long-standing corruption in US elections and a
partisan Supreme Court. Election problems were
widely reported in the foreign press. The Congress gave the
illusion of action by passing the
HAVA, but it
did little to actually clean up or improve elections.
Corporate media ,especially Fox News, cheerled these things and
they were rewarded when Michael Powell pushed for still more media
concentration. According to former CIA Director William Colby: "The
Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major
media." For whatever reason
media never held Bush or the Republicans accountable
for their horrendous failures. Remember how Reagan was Teflon-man ?
Fox News was complicit in spreading the lie that
Iraq
was complicit with the attacks of 9/11 .
Bush reliably favored the corporate interest over everyone else's. Actually,
the dictionary definition of
fascism
is control of government by
corporations. We've got that. Bush populated US
government with corporate cronies who were determined to enrich themselves at
the expense of most everybody else. It appears that none of the US agencies
serve the people any longer. It is no surprise that the US is rapidly being deindustrialized
as jobs continue to hemorrhage to low-wage countries. As corporations shed
employee benefits, risk has been shifted to families, and everyone is more
insecure. The weapons industry may
turn out to be the employer of last resort for Americans, and automatically that
translates to a takeover by the military-industrial complex. (Ike warned us
about that, but media memory is very short or very selective. Also, they are war
profiteers.)
Regulatory agencies became captives of their industries.
This is obvious from the drug industry, meat packing, media, environment and
others. It is probably prudent not to eat beef…
Under Bush, US leadership was incompetent, illiterate, self-serving, and
criminal. Bush did not listen to people who disagree with
him, so we were
condemned to bad decisions at the highest levels of our government. Nixon era,
Iran-Contra felons were brought back, Enron refugees installed, right wing incompetents
like Rumsfeld brought us massively expensive, morally repugnant, bad decisions.
Secrecy covered most of it so Congress could do no
oversight. Instead, we got an imperial Presidency
and a pretext for empire.
When Bush Jr took office, there was a real danger that peace would break out.
Bush was determined, according to Paul O'Neill and the Downing Street memo,
to invade Iraq from the moment he took office. Francis Boyle writes in his
book
"Destroying
World Order- U.S. Imperialism in the Middle East Before and After September 11. "It is now a matter of public record that immediately after being inaugurated as
president in January 2001, George Bush, Jr., Vice-President Dick Cheney,
Secretary of War Donald
Rumsfeld, and his pro-Israeli 'Neoconservative' Deputy
Paul Wolfowitz began to plot, plan, scheme, and conspire to wage a war of
aggression against Iraq," Boyle writes. "Later, they manipulated the tragic
events of September 11 in order to provide a pretext for doing so. The fact that
Iraq had nothing at all to do with September 11 or supporting Al-Qaeda - as the
CIA itself advised - made no difference to Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, their
Undersecretary of War Douglas Feith, Undersecretary of State John Bolton, and
the numerous other pro-Israeli Neo-Cons inhabiting the Bush, Jr.
administration." The
Downing Street Memo demonstrated an intent to manipulate 'intelligence' to
go to war, the Bush agenda was enabled by 9/11, and Bush claimed "war powers" to
justify an imperial presidency. The Constitution has been shredded.
In the 1970's Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz made the
case for a Soviet
Union that was ten feet tall and resulted in the Reagan's trillion dollar arms
bill. They duped us again. They twisted 'intelligence' to make a
case
for war in Iraq and enriched themselves and their
cronies
in the process. Again, as in the Reagan years, they have cooked the books
to disguise the mountain of debt that has all
but bankrupted the US. The War on Iraq was kept off the books, while Social
Security was assessed as a financial problem. Bush
tax cuts were regressive and provided little economic stimulus. As a result we may
come a little closer to an aristocracy. It is one of the hallmarks
of a banana republic that while taxpayers accumulate massive debt, an elite
group enrich themselves.
After 9/11 and a still unresolved anthrax
attack struck fear into the hearts of Americans, made it the pretext
for endless war, Republicans pushed through the Patriot Act, an assault
on the Bill of Rights. Contrary to the Constitution W took it upon
himself to expand Presidential power, declared himself a war president
and argued that he is above the law. A subservient Congress and a
packed Supreme Court allowed this to happen, but it is at the expense
of Constitutional government. Those checks and balances that we all
learned about have been seriously eroded. Like other republics in
history, we too are becoming an empire. We will share their fate.
W presided over the most secretive administration in history. A cloud of
secrecy was scrupulously kept over the investigation of 9/11, war profiteering,
unauthorized surveillance, and the justification for his endless war. Secrecy
covered up his unauthorized, illegal surveillance of
Americans as well as the torture and rendition committed in US facilities (some
secret) around
the world. His refusal to join the International Criminal Court is no surprise.
The American Bar Association
accuses
President Bush, of violating both the Constitution and federal law. A
President above
the law is a dictator, not just an
insult to the Constitution.
John Conyers (D., Mich.) released a staggering report with
the hard evidence of crimes and abuses committed by President Bush and his
administration (breaking 26 specific laws). This report, "The Constitution in
Crisis," should provide the raw material for numerous news reports and point
reporters toward fertile ground for additional investigations. Have a look at
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/constitutionincrisis
As Noam Chomsky points out in his recent book "Failed States", Bush
brought us closer to nuclear and environmental disaster, thumbed his nose at
international law, and earned the
hostility of most of the world. See books for more.
According to
Seymour
Hersh, the US helped
plan Israel's invasion of Lebanon as a preliminary
step to a possible pre-emptive strike on
Iran.
Bush has committed criminal acts and should be
impeached.
The Bush Crimes Commission
documents the evidence on wars of aggression, detention and
torture, destruction
of the global environment, sabotage of global health programs, and the
abandonment of New Orleans. Twisting
'intelligence', war profiteering, pre-emptive war, and hiding all of these
crimes behind a veil of secrecy by making them 'classified' are all high crimes.
See this link.
The Guardian. The Abu Ghraib photographs awakened many
in the US to the abuses that lie beneath the rhetoric of the global war on
terror but the institutions responsible have not taken the message on board. On
the day the Congressional report into 9/11 was published, another document was
quietly released - a military report that exonerated the high command for the
Abu Ghraib abuses. The implications go beyond Abu Ghraib: without a repudiation
of the administration's actions, there will be no remedy for the even more
sinister treatment of the unknown number of prisoners not captured on camera -
those who have been kidnapped and disappeared by US forces across the world. See
this link also.
Signing the Constitution Away By Eric Alterman 03 May 2006 "Last Sunday,
the Boston Globe’s Charlie Savage broke a story that should be shocking to all
of us had we not grown inured to the casual contempt toward the Constitution
that the Bush administration deems to be its droite d’etat. ...Savage reported
that, 'President [sic] Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more
than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to
set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his
interpretation of the Constitution.'"
The New York Times disclosure of an official National Intelligence Estimate,
which states that the Iraq invasion has worsened the global terrorist threat,
carries an unspoken subtext - that the Bush administration is either woefully
ignorant of how to combat terrorism or finds the terrorist threat a useful tool
for managing the American public.
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/092606a.html
Where Are the Checks, Balances?
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/110706K.shtml
"Bush has been 'making it up' for too long, and the people have let him," says
Keith Olbermann. "And whatever your motives of the moment, we the people have,
in true good faith and with the genuine patriotism of self-sacrifice (of which
you have shown you know nothing), we have let you go on making it up as you went
along. Unchecked and unbalanced."
Takeover: the
Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion of American Democracy.
Charlie Savage (winner of the Pulitzer Prize)
At the end of this chilling volume Savage offers a concise and powerful
conclusion: "The expansive presidential powers claimed and
exercised by the Bush-Cheney White House are now an immutable part of American
history — not controversies but facts. The importance of such precedents is
difficult to overstate. As Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson once warned, any
new claim of executive power, once validated into precedent, 'lies about like a
loaded weapon ready for the hand of any authority that can bring forward a
plausible claim of an urgent need. Every repetition embeds that principle more
deeply in our law and thinking and expands it to new purposes.' "Sooner or
later, there will always be another urgent need."
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Crimes Against Nature: How George W. Bush and
His Corporate Pals Are Plundering the Country and Hijacking Our Democracy,
(2004)
ISBN 0-06-074687-4