"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will
be, secure when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them . .
." —Patrick Henry
"...Secret executive
agreements that make commitments of unknown magnitude; presidential warmaking
and bombing hooded in secrecy; escalation by stealth in Vietnam in the teeth
of bleak intelligence estimates not disclosed to the nation; “White House
Horrors”—the words are those of John Mitchell, former partner and Attorney
General of President Nixon—spreading a miasma of encroachments on individual
rights. These events have confirmed Patrick Henry’s warning that secrecy In
government is an “abomination”; it is a main instrument in the corruption and
arrogation of power. If the nation has not relearned that lesson from the
secret escalation in Vietnam, from the bold attempt to corrupt the electoral
process that surfaced in Watergate, it is unteachable.
...Another lesson
to be learned from the past forty years of implicit trust in the wisdom of the
President is that he, no less than Congress, may prove sadly deficient in
vision." From the conclusion of
Executive Privilege, a Constitutional Myth by Raoul Berger (1974)
"Why did the presidents and their men get the Soviet economy so
wrong, and why were they so confident that they were right ? They supposedly
had access to the best intelligence of all about the Soviets, that is,
secret intelligence. The problem with this intelligence, Moynihan began to
suspect, was precisely that it was secret...Proceeding from these secret
assessments of Soviet strength rather than from the openly available facts
about the sorry state of the Soviet Union, the Carter and Reagan
administrations went on history's greatest peacetime weapons spending spree,
and in six years (1982-88) the United States transformed itself from the
world's greatest creditor nation into the leading debtor "while we're not
disintegrating" Moynihan wrote in 1990, "we clearly blew an extraordinary
economic lead." From the introduction to Secrecy by Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
Government relies upon a
mix of carrots and sticks to control the press—promises of enhanced or
special access, and threats of exclusion, even prosecution. There have been
appeals to patriotism, efforts at suppression, self-censorship, propaganda,
and intimidation. An administration that has been intent upon spreading
democracy around the globe has shown little regard for transparency at home.
It has secretly paid journalists to promote its agenda and planted stories
in the Iraqi press. It has emasculated the Freedom of Information Act,
reversing its presumption of openness. It has shut down access to all manner
of records and even culled the past at the National Archives. Senior
officials have felt free to belittle journalists who show the temerity to
ask tough questions.
...
In May 2006, ABC News
claimed that calls made by its reporters and others at the New York Times
and Washington Post were being traced by the government in an effort to
track down leaks of classified information. Many government sources, perhaps
most, no longer feel comfortable speaking to reporters on the phone,
especially when the subject is even remotely sensitive. Those kinds of
worries on the part of reporters and sources alike have taken their toll on
journalism and on what Americans may learn of their government.
“The administration wants
journalism stopped,” Rep. James A. McDermott, a Washington Democrat, charged
on the House floor on May 9, 2006. “It just gets in the way of the
administration telling people only what they want them to know. .. . They
know that secrecy is the fastest, most effective way to silence dissent.”
Such efforts to suppress
news and keep secrets under wraps has severely tarnished America’s image
abroad. Today, five journalists have been detained in American detention
centers—four Iraqis are being held in Iraq and one Sudanese, an Al Jazeera
cameraman, is at Guantánamo. None has been charged with a crime. The
Committee to Protect Journalists says the United States now ranks sixth in
the world for the number of reporters behind bars—a tie with the repressive
regime of Myanmar (formerly Burma).
Many overseas news
organizations and their audiences are convinced that the U.S. military
deliberately targets foreign newsmen to suppress the news and keep a lid on
information. In November 2001, the United States dropped two 500-pound bombs
on Al Jazeera’s bureau in Kabul, Afghanistan. Five years later, the Pentagon
still has not responded to the Committee to Protect Journalists’ call for an
investigation into the strike.
On April 7,
2003, as Al Jazeera reporter Tariq Ayub was broadcasting live from the
organization’s Baghdad bureau, a missile fired from a U.S. jet slammed into
the building, killing him instantly. Nation of Secrets: Ted Gup
Having failed to learn lessons from history, we went to war in Iraq based on
twisted information. The same people, some
felons, who justified the massive and dysfunctional arms buildup in the
Reagan administration also were responsible for twisting 'intelligence' to
justify the war in Iraq. Although media
is complicit in keeping Americans ignorant about these facts, Congress,
unwilling or unable to access classified information, failed in its
oversight
of the executive branch.
Secrecy will likely be a fatal poison for the US
Constitution.
Covert agencies with secret, undisclosed budgets continue to operate in
ways that Americans would never approve.
They are (and ought to be)
unconstitutional.
Bush's Martial Law Plan Is So Shocking, Even Congress Can't See It
--Executive uber alles as member of Homeland Security Committee barred from
viewing post-terror attack provisions By Paul Joseph Watson 23 Jul 2007
President [sic] Bush's post-terror attack martial law plan is so shocking that
even sitting members of Congress and Homeland Security officials are barred from
viewing it, another example of executive uber alles and a chilling portent of
what is to come as constant reminders of the inevitability of terror attacks
reverberate... Since [Rep. Peter] DeFazio (D-OR) also sits on the Homeland
Security Committee and has clearance to view classified material, the request
would have appeared to be routine, but the Congressman was unceremoniously
denied all access to view the documents, and the White House wouldn't even give
an excuse as to why he was barred.
Bush Administration Ramps Up Secrecy
t r u t h o u t | 09.10.07
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091007A.shtml
William Fisher reports for Truthout: "The Bush administration is continuing its
campaign to keep the public in the dark about the federal government's policies
and decisions and to suppress discussion of those policies, their underpinnings,
and their implications. This is the conclusion reached in the latest annual
'report card' on government secrecy compiled by
OpenTheGovernment.org, a
coalition of consumer and good government groups, librarians, environmentalists,
labor leaders, journalists, and others who seek to promote greater transparency
in public institutions."