What we are seeing now is the conservative message machine
preparing the country to accept the ideas of a nuclear war and nation
destruction against Iran. The technique used is the "slippery
slope." It is done by degrees. Like the proverbial frog in the pot of
water – if the heat is turned up slowly the frog gets used to the heat
and eventually boils to death – the American public is getting
gradually acclimated to the idea of war with Iran.
Bush threatens Iran with military action 17
Jun 2008 George Bush has warned Iran that military action is still "on
the table" if it fails to respond to tightening diplomatic pressure to
abandon its nuclear weapons programme. The EU is planning to announce
the freezing of all overseas assets of the main bank in Iran. Sanctions
are also to be tightened on gas and oil exports by Iran.
On CBS's Face the Nation,
Lieberman said, "If [the Iranians] don't play by the rules, we've got
to use our force, and to me, that would include taking military action
to stop them from doing what they're doing."
Fearing Escalation, Pentagon Fought Cheney Iran Plan
06 Jun 2008 Pentagon officials firmly opposed a proposal by Vice
President [sic] Dick Cheney last summer for airstrikes against Iranian
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) bases by insisting that the
administration would have to make clear decisions about how far the
United States would go in escalating the conflict with Iran, according
to a former George W. Bush administration official. J. Scott Carpenter,
who was then deputy assistant secretary of state in the State
Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, recalled in an interview
that senior Defence Department (DoD) officials and the Joint Chiefs
used the escalation issue as the main argument against the Cheney
proposal.
First, describe Iran as evil – part of the axis of evil. An
inherently evil person will inevitably do evil things and can't be
negotiated with. An entire evil nation is a threat to other nations.
Second, describe Iran's leader as a "Hitler" who is
inherently "evil" and cannot be reasoned with. Refuse to negotiate with
him.
Then repeat the lie that Iran is on the verge of having
nuclear weapons —weapons of mass destruction. IAEA Director General
Mohamed ElBaradei says they are at best many years away.
Call nuclear development "an existential threat" – a threat
to our very existence.
Then suggest a single "surgical" "attack" on Natanz and
make it seem acceptable.
Then find a reason to call the attack "self-defense" — or
better protection for our troops from the EFP's, or single-shot
canister bombs.
Claim, without proof and without anyone even taking
responsibility for the claim, that the Iranian government at its
highest level is supplying deadly weapons to Shiite militias attacking
our troops, while not mentioning the fact that Saudi Arabia is helping
Sunni insurgents attacking our troops.
Give "protecting our troops" as a reason for attacking Iran
without getting new authorization from Congress. Claim that the old
authorization for attacking Iraq implied doing "whatever is necessary
to protect our troops" from Iranian intervention in Iraq.
Argue that de-escalation in Iraq would "bleed" our troops,
"weaken" America, and lead to defeat. This sets up escalation as a
winning policy, if not in Iraq then in Iran.
Get the press to go along with each step.
Never mention the words "preventive nuclear war" or
"national destruction." When asked, say "All options are on the
table." Keep the issue of nuclear war and its consequences from
being seriously discussed by the national media.
Intimidate Democratic presidential candidates into
agreeing, without using the words, that nuclear war should be "on the
table." This makes nuclear war and nation destruction
bipartisan and even more acceptable.
We can attack Iran, says US commander 20
Oct 2007 America's top military officer said the country does have the
resources to attack Iran, despite the strain of wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Adm Michael Mullen, who took over as chairman of the US
Joint Chiefs of Staff three weeks ago, said diplomacy remained the
priority in dealing with Iran's suspected plans to develop a nuclear
weapon and its [alleged] support for anti-US 'insurgents' in Iraq. But
at a press conference he said: "there is more than enough
reserve to respond (militarily) if that, in fact, is what the national
leadership wanted to do".
Shifting Targets--The Administration's
plan for Iran By Seymour M. Hersh 08 Oct 2007 The revised bombing
plan for a possible attack, with its tightened focus on
counterterrorism, is gathering support among generals and admirals in
the Pentagon. The strategy calls for the use of sea-launched cruise
missiles and more precisely targeted ground attacks and bombing
strikes, including plans to destroy the most important Revolutionary
Guard training camps, supply depots, and command and control
facilities. "Cheney's option is now for a fast in and out—for
surgical strikes," the former senior American intelligence official
told me... A Pentagon consultant on counterterrorism told me that, if
the bombing campaign took place, it would be accompanied by a series of
what he called "short, sharp incursions" by American Special Forces
units into suspected Iranian training sites. He said, "Cheney is
devoted to this, no question."
US garners support for strike on Iran 02 Oct 2007 Australia,
Britain and Israel have reportedly "expressed interest" in a US
campaign to launch surgical bombing raids on Iran targeting
Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities. A
report in The New Yorker by the
journalist Seymour Hersh said the Bush Administration had stopped
trying to justify a campaign against Iran on the basis of curtailing
Iran's nuclear ambitions. It is instead redefining the war in Iraq as a
strategic battle between the US and Iran.
US 'planning surgical Iran strikes' 01 Oct
2007 Australia, Britain and Israel have "expressed interest" in a US
campaign to launch "surgical" bombing raids on Iran targetting the
Revolutionary Guard Corps facilities,
according to one of America's leading
investigative reporters, Seymour Hersh.
How Cheney Cooked the Intelligence on Iran
Dick Cheney has been trying to pressure
intelligence analysts who have not drunk the neocon kool-aid on Iran to
go along with his line on the issues at stake in a National
Intelligence Estimate on Iran that the White House has been holding up
for more than a year.
(August 9, 2007) At a news conference Thursday, Bush said
Iran had been warned of unspecified consequences if it continued its
alleged support for anti-American forces in Iraq. U.S. Ambassador to
Iraq Ryan Crocker had conveyed the warning in meetings with his Iranian
counterpart in Baghdad, the president said. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/18834.html
According to Seymour Hersh,
Bush and Cheny have already launched pre-war operations in Iran with money illegally taken from
elsewhere, exactly as they began the current war in Iraq over four
years ago.
Even more incredibly, Hersh
reports Bush and Cheney are funneling the money to Al Qaeda groups - the very terrorists who murdered
nearly 3,000 Americans on September 11, whose destruction has allegedly
been the ultimate goal of the Bush Administration ever since.
Iran was our ally after 9/11
and helped us drive the Taliban out of Afghanistan. In 2003,
Iran sent a letter to Bush through the Swiss ambassador and Rep. Bob Ney
(R-OH) offering far-reaching compromises on its nuclear program,
relations with Hezbollah and Hamas and support for a Palestinian peace
agreement with Israel. Yet Cheney rejected the offer and even
reprimanded the Swiss ambassador for sending it.
Now Bush is accusing Iran of
arming Iraqi insurgents, but evidence to the contrary is piling up. Here's a growing collection of lies about Iran by
the White House. And here are simple talking points for opponents of this looming war.
Sign the Petition. This
petition has over 99,000 signatures. If you send it to everyone you
know, it will top 100,000 this week: http://www.dontattackiran.org
With two aircraft carrier groups in the Persian Gulf, Bush
could bomb Iran on a moment's notice. If Bush administration bombs Iran
despite our efforts, we will respond. And we will hold Congressmen
Dennis Kucinich and John Conyers to their commitments to pursue
impeachment if Bush and Cheney attack Iran: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/iranresponse
Daniel Ellsberg, of "Pentagon Papers" fame, told Democracy
Now that he believes Bush plans to attack Iran, probably without
informing Congress. Ellsberg says a similar escalation happened during
the Vietnam War, when the battlefield was extended into Laos and
Cambodia. Could this be possible?
The analogy is correct. I think this president is looking to
expand the war. His comments about Iran and Syria were not
conciliatory. He's rattling the saber at a time when saber-rattling
hurts our troops. It's the kind of tough talk that dragged us into this
war, the same braggadocio that doesn't pass for statecraft, but shows
an administration that's out of control. Here's a president who's
putting his foot on the accelerator as the car heads toward the cliff.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/48535/
Regime Change Is the Reason, Disarmament the Excuse
An interview with Scott Ritter by Scott Horton Interviewed February 20,
2007 – Listen
to the interview.
Second American Aircraft Carrier Heads to Persian Gulf.
Interview with Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian- American
Council, conducted by Scott HarrisScript
summary/Related links
US Sending Third Carrier Strike Group to Persian Gulf
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/021107B.shtml
The Iranians have reason to feel paranoid. At least one former White
House official contends that some Bush advisers secretly want an excuse
to attack Iran. A second Navy carrier group is steaming toward the
Persian Gulf, and a third carrier will likely follow.
02/24/07 "The Telegraph" -- -- Israel is negotiating with the United
States for permission to fly over Iraq as part of a plan to attack
Iran's nuclear facilities, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.
The Coming Attack on Iran
Paul
Craig Roberts
The US media is totally unreliable. It cannot go against Israel, and it
will wrap itself in the flag just as it did for the invasion of Iraq.
The American public has been deceived (again) and believes that Iran is
on the verge of possessing nuclear armaments to be used to wipe Israel
off the map. http://tinyurl.com/w7xve