Tea Party
When criticism is lobbed at the Tea Party as being an Astroturf
rebranding of the Republican Party, sponsored by the corporate media,
it's because it is. (Tina
Dupuy)
What we are observing, then, is a populist movement that has
done irreversible harm to the material interests of the common people
it professes to love so tenderly-a form of class animosity that rages
against a shadowy “elite” while enthroning a new aristocracy of
bankers, brokers, and corporate thieves. (from What's
the Matter with Kansas: Thomas Frank)
Right now, government is being run for the benefit of a
few. It doesn't have to be that way. Unfortunately, Americans have been
brainwashed by the corporate media to hate the only device that can be
used
to save them: government. Jay Hanson
In the free
marketplace of ideas, money can often win the argument. The
Citizen's United decision caused a flood of it from bank bailouts,
health insurance proceeds, wealthy 'conservatives',
oil companies and other corporations.
Lobbyists handle massive amounts. The Chamber of Commerce can funnel it
to media to hide the actual
source and a lot goes to Rupert
Murdoch's minions.
Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt
Gingrich are highly paid Fox News political
analysts. So are Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity. These are the
people that initiated and nurtured the tea party movement. Rupert
Murdoch, the owner of Fox News, has all
of them on his payroll. (See Radio
also.)
As he took over the Wall Street Journal, Murdoch said "The New
York Times sets the national agenda, and we should." No doubt the
Murdoch agenda IS the Tea Party agenda. No one should doubt that
expensive
elections benefit media.
Think about this for a moment: Rush has a $400
million contract. Who would come up with that kind of money for him
?
Given Murdoch's role, it is no surprise that the tea party
message is corporate. Denying global
warming is good for oil companies, opposing health care reform benefits insurance
companies and pharma, blocking renewed regulation of the
financial sector satisfies banks and sets the stage for another even
worse collapse of the economy, privatization
removes activities from public oversight, deficit mongering that leads
to cuts in government spending could devastate the economy. (Economists
like Joseph
Stiglitz, Paul
Krugman and
James Galbraith opine that the stimulus was much too small and
that, given the amount of joblessness, more is needed.) This is not
time to balance the Federal Budget. If tea partiers have their way, we
are in for much worse. Taking a meat axe to government is no solution.
TP's cry "Socialism" as if that
were a complete argument. Few of them would likely renounce Social Security or Medicare. We should
learn some lessons from countries that are functioning well: Finland
has the highest quality education in the world, Denmark,
Sweden, and Norway
all have well-run social programs. All have mixed economies where
government does what is best public, and the private sectors are
thriving as well.
What health care reform can do is allow people to buy health
insurance from a private company, they will be able to buy it even if
they have a pre-existing condition, it will not be capped, and they
will not be dropped when they actually need it. TP's think that is not
a good thing. They are wrong again.
One of the characteristics of the U.S. 'free' market is
it tends to consolidate smaller companies into larger ones. We are told that this is more efficient, but the
consolidation is always followed by layoffs. The product usually
declines in quality. Consumer complaints are simply ignored. Growing
corporate power trumps the wishes of people because they can hire
expensive lobbyists and you can't. Some become too big to fail and
then require taxpayer bailout. Many have found great profits by moving
to subsistence wage countries with no environmental restrictions:
capitalist paradise. That's how the free market stripped the U.S. of
manufacturing. TP's think the 'market' makes better decisions than
democratically elected government. That sound like respect for the Constitution ?
It was uncontrolled capitalism that caused our current financial
collapse. It happened in the 1930's, and there were a number of lessons
learned at that time that 'conservatives'
worked hard so that we would forget. When income disparities get too large, the
economy does not work, and that is why a heavily graduated tax is a
good idea. A graduated tax is designed to
weigh on those who can best afford it. It is a good response to obscene
gains of hedge fund managers and CEO's who have no shame. If there is
highly leveraged speculation, then the real economy can be the victim.
Repeal of the Glass-Steagle Act that kept banks from speculating with
government insured deposits was folly. Corruption naturally arose
because no one was watching, that's why reregulation is a must to avoid
worse crashes in the future. The tea partiers, disregarding predatory
lenders, would oppose this.
When 'conservatives'
strike fear into the tea parties about deficits, the subject usually
turns to cutting Social Security or yet another attempt to privatize
it. Although we have the world's largest military budget, that
never comes up as wasteful expenditure even if when it is plain to see
that there is massive corruption. There is always plenty of money for
war, never for people. We need better social programs, not worse
because in economic downturns, they stabilize.
Large amounts of corporate money are
given to
denying
global warming and the TP's are persuaded. We live on the only
planet capable
of human habitation and these 'conservatives'
have no intention of conserving it for future generations.
Fox News, funded by irresponsible corporate
advertisers, is a propaganda outlet for the Republican
Party and it has successfully convinced the TPs to vote against their
own self interest. Fox fosters this
by disdaining educated
opinion. Since Republicans are
the party of the wealthy, their main concern is cutting taxes.
The tea
party movement is uncompromising, polarizing, armed and angry. That too benefits
corporate war profiteers. There has been a run on guns and ammunition.
Angry mobs with guns will naturally lead to more expensive 'homeland
security'.
The way a broadcaster can influence public policy for the
worse, incite the people to rebellion,
arm them to create civil disturbances, and hype elections is now a
fundamental problem for Americans. We
have seen the power
of talk radio in Rwanda. (Don't
worry though. You ARE protected from those 7 dirty words...unless you
pay for them on premium cable channels.)
Murdoch's empire should be broken up, but
instead a recent Supreme Court ruling
will allow unlimited corporate spending on elections. That will mark
the end of real elections in the U.S. The
tea party agenda will destroy the economy, much like it has in
California. What brought us back in the late 1930's was a massive
government spending program: World War II. This may be a Weimar
moment. If it is, a lot of credit goes to Rupert Murdoch and his tea
party movement. (See Fascism.)
...we can look forward with confidence to
character-building bankruptcies, picturesque bread riots, thrilling
cavalcades of splendidly costumed motorcycle police. Lewis
Lapham (Harper's Magazine Oct. 2005)
"When fascism
comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross."
Sinclair Lewis (1935)
The
Weekly Spin, August 18, 2010
Highlight
This Week
The front page of USA
Today August 13 was consumed with an extensive article titled "Faces of the Tea Party: Tea
Party members offer ground-level view," which featured anecdotal
interviews with ordinary people who said they agree with the movement.
But the article offered no information putting the movement in the
context of the larger political picture in the U.S. For example, it
points out that Tea Party candidates were victorious in primary
elections in Colorado, Kentucky, Nevada and Utah, and, while it
questions the ability of the candidates to win in the general election
in November, it fails to mention that the candidates' victories boost
the possibilities that Democrats will ultimately prevail in these
states. Another significant omission is that article also fails to
mention how remarkably far out of the mainstream many Tea Party
candidates are. Nevada's victorious Tea Party Senate candidate, Sharron
Angle, seeks to dismantle Medicare and Social Security and hand
their functions to the private sector. Kentucky's Tea Party Senate
candidate, Rand Paul, belongs to a group of physicians that denies the link between HIV and AIDS and argues
that Barack Obama controls his audiences through a
covert form of hypnosis. Colorado's victorious gubernatorial Tea Party
candidate, Dan Maes, told a crowd of his supporters that Denver's new
bicycle sharing program is really part of a United Nations plot to "rein in American cities,"
put the environment above citizens' rights, and curtail personal
freedoms.
Read the rest of this item
|
|
7
Tricks Teabaggers Will Use to Conceal Their Extreme Right-Wing Beliefs
Tea Party
Fact Checking (2/8/2010)How
the Right-Wing and Corporate Media Brainwash Americans
Is America
Yearning for Fascism ? (3/30/2010)
Tea
Party mocks man with Parkinson's Disease
Why Do Anti-Government Tea Partiers Love Government Handouts ?
(3/28/2010)
Why
aren’t Tea Partiers upset about McCain and Lieberman’s power grab?
(3/22/2010)
What
if Tea Partiers Ran the Country ?
Racism,
Homophobia dominates Tea Party Protest Over Health Care Bill
(3/22/2010)
The
Economic Elite vs The People of the United States
The Axis
of the Obsessed and Deranged (2/27/2010)
The
GOP's 'Tea Party' Dance (2/21/2010)
Unmasking
Astroturf: Smear Campaigns Threaten Health Care and Net Neutrality
(8/21/2009)
"Over the past few weeks there have been
a number of commentaries about Ronald Reagan's legacy, specifically
about whether he exploited the white backlash against the civil rights
movement. The controversy unfortunately obscures the larger point,
which should be undeniable: the central role of this backlash in the
rise of the modern conservative movement." Paul
Krugman, The New York Times: 11/19/2007
Bibliography
American Grace: Robert
Putnam and David E. Campbell
|