A
desert for jobs and no end in sight: While millions of workers are
struggling to get by on inadequate
unemployment benefits, millions more are cut off completely as
joblessness rises.
One of the reasons that the US has nonsensical social programs
is that Republicans with their corporate
allies have made union busting a high priority. The result is our health care, family time, long-term care,
and other programs are at the bottom of budget priorities, and, unlike
other developed countries, do little to mitigate insecurity for
Americans. Fast track trade
agreements also depress US wages. Workers, having maxed out their
credit cards, consumption is not likely to recover any time soon. The
Grim Truth (4/8/2010)
Fox hosts make it clear they are
simply against unions. When they insist that union bosses - not
employers - are intimidating workers, or when they declare that unions
that drive up wages and benefits are harmful for Big Business, it's
clear whose side they're on - and it's not the American worker's. Watch
Here »
"Labor, as a commodity, is subject to virtually no
regulation. In international commerce, labor is at the whim of
capitalism in its most rudimentary form. The labor component of every
product can be as cheap as the market wants it to be, and it can be
provided under inhumane conditions and with complete disregard for all
domestic standards from occupational hygiene to equal rights for women
to prohibitions on child labor - and yet no one at the customs office
is evenly remotely interested." The War For Wealth, the True Story of
Globalization, or why the flat World is Broken: Gabor Steingart
US policy of Union Busting
The US is a signer of the UN
declaration of Human Rights that asserts that everyone has the right to
join a union. It just doesn't practice what it preaches.
(See International Law.)
In 1981 Ronald Reagan made an assault in the Republican war on labor. "Reagan
gave dedicated union foes direct control of the federal agencies that
were designed originally to protect and further the rights and
interests of workers and their unions."
Continuing in the path set by his role-model Reagan, Bush was
virulently anti-labor. He made vigorous attempts to 'reform' Social
Security' (remember when a Republican says reform...he means destroy),
looks the other way while Corporations bust unions and outsource, and
otherwise promotes regressive policies.
Automobile companies have bought
out their union workers, even while sending small car production to
Asia.
Walmart, when faced
with a successful union drive in Canada, simply closed the store. It
has no shame in sending its employees onto public services when they
need health care or other assistance. (About Walmart)
A new study recently released by John Logan, a lecturer at
the London School of Economics, points out that the intensity of
employer opposition and government hostility to collective bargaining
in the United States is unique among developed nations.
This “repressive character of U.S. labor law, which allows
free rein to
anti-union employers,” not only hurts workers in the United States and
in other nations, Logan said today.
There is growing evidence that consultants, employer groups
and
multinational corporations are exporting U.S.-originated anti-union
strategies to other developed countries such as the United Kingdom and
Ireland and to transforming countries such as China.
Strengthening the right to organize and bargain collectively
through
the Employee
Free Choice Act would benefit not only American workers, but also
workers in other nations.
Feb. 21: The Attack on the Employee Free Choice Act
If U.S. workers could earn higher wages, benefits, and better
working conditions, who would be against them?
A powerful network of anti-union employers, conservative
business associations, industry lobbying groups, and right-wing policy
centers and policymakers seeks to shut down choice in the American
workplace. Get up-to-speed about the opponents of the Employee
Free Choice Act by checking
out our new backgrounder.
"Not since the Great Depression has the American worker faced such a
bleak future. According to the National Alliance to End
Homelessness, incomes for the lowest income quintile have declined
during the past decade and the gap between the rich and the poor grows
bigger each year. In essence, the rich are getting richer - and the
poor are getting poorer. It's high time for a change," says Jay
Richards.
Capitol Hill Holds Hearing on Black Male Unemployment
The black male unemployment rate is unacceptably high and it is time
for the federal government to do something about it. That was the
conclusion of a March 5 hearing held by the Joint Economic Committee, a
bicameral, bipartisan committee of US representatives and senators who
are charged with studying the nation's economy and making
recommendations to the government for changes, if necessary.
"The owner of the means of production is in a position to
purchase the labor power of the worker. By using the means of
production, the worker produces new goods which become the property of
the capitalist. The essential point about this process is the relation
between what the worker produces and what he is paid, both measured in
terms of real value. Insofar as the labor contract is “free,” what the
worker receives is determined not by the real value of the goods he
produces, but by his minimum needs and by the capitalists’ requirements
for labor power in relation to the number of workers competing for
jobs. It is important to understand that even in theory the payment of
the worker is not determined by the value of his product.
Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands,
partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because
technological development and the increasing division of labor
encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of
the smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of
private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively
checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is
true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political
parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private
capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate
from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of
the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the
underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing
conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or
indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).
It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite
impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions
and to make intelligent use of his political rights." Einstein on
Politics, Rowe and Schulmann. Monthly Review, May 1949
The
asymmetry in liberalization of capital and labor flows leads to a
further
inequity. With capital markets liberalized, countries have to fight to
keep capital by lowering taxes on corporations.
Because labor - especially unskilled labor is not as mobile, they don't
have to fight as hard to keep it. Hence asymmetric
liberalization leads to shifting the burden of taxes on to workers -
leading to reduced progressivity in the tax system. The same thing
happens
in wage bargaining: workers are told that if they do not accept lower
wages and reduced protection, the capital (with its jobs) will move
overseas. Joseph Stiglitz. Making Globalization Work.
Which Side Are You On?
Thomas Geoghegan - Union elections are rigged too, and this
excellent book describes why the Labor Department is part of the
problem.
Nickel and Dimed: Surviving in Low-Wage America, Barbara Ehrenreich
Throughout her three decades of journalism and activism, Ehrenreich has
been one of the most consistent chroniclers of class in America.
Listen/Watch/Read