In the past fifty years we've doubled our irrigated
cropland and tripled our water consumption to meet global food demand.
In the
next fifty, we must double food production again. Is there really
enough water to pull that off ? In his book When the Rivers Run Dry
environmental journalist Fred
Pearce
describes in vivid, firsthand detail the stark reality of impending
water crises in more than thirty countries around the globe. We now
withdraw so much water that
many of our mightiest and most historic rivers - like the Nile, the
Colorado, the Yellow, the Indus - have barely a trickle left to meet
the sea. (From the World in
2050: Laurence C Smith)
The 6 Weirdest, Scariest Processed Foods By Brad Reed, AlterNet Once upon a time, some
brave scientists had a noble dream of ridding food of nutrients. That
dream is closer to reality than ever. more »
1. Only 1% of
imported food is inspected. Because the federal government refuses to
implement a country-of-origin labeling program for meat and produce,
consumers don’t have the facts they need to avoid low-quality food from
overseas.
2. Despite new
research that shows that artificial hormones may contribute to a
five-fold increase in twin pregnancies for American women, the federal
government still allows them in dairy products. They are banned in Canada and Europe.
3. Instead of
forcing meat producers to fix serious sanitation problems at factory
farms and slaughterhouses, the federal government allows them to take
dangerous shortcuts like pumping livestock full of antibiotics, dipping
carcasses in toxic disinfectants, and irradiating meat.
4. Although
mad cow disease presents a lethal threat to public health, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture has blocked meatpackers from implementing
their own mad cow testing programs.
5. The Bush
Administration and its allies in Congress want to weaken the Safe Water
Drinking Act, which may lead to more cancer and disease-causing
contaminants in the tap water of millions of Americans.
The New York Times | Politics and Hunger
http://www.truthout.org/article/politics-and-hunger
The New York Times writes, "One might expect that food riots in Egypt
and Haiti would convince the world's wealthy nations of the need to do
more to feed the world's poorest. If not, maybe the threat of 100
million more people falling into poverty due to soaring food prices
would spur them to help. Yet at last week's United Nations food summit,
the world's more-developed nations proved, once again, that domestic
politics trumps both humanitarian concerns and sound strategic
calculations."
"Unsafe foods cause an estimated 76 million
illnesses and 5,000 deaths each year in the United States. Although
people from all walks of life can develop food borne illness, those who
are most at risk include the elderly, young children, pregnant women
and their fetuses, and the immunocompromised. While most illnesses
occur as isolated cases, outbreaks of foodborne illness are clusters of
illness that result from ingestion of a common contaminated food. A
single outbreak can affect hundreds, or even thousands, of people. From
Outbreak
Alert.
"If genetically modified foods can't be excluded from
Europe, those who object to them want full disclosure of the
genetically modified content of these foods - labeling, so that
consumers can choose what they want to buy. But the United States -
normally a believer in free trade and consumer choice -has in this case
taken the position that full disclosure would be a trade barrier. A
large proportion of America's agricultural exports contains a
genetically modified ingredient; America correctly worries that, given
the level of concern about genetically modified foods, European
consumers would stop buying many American-produced foods. The United
States is putting its right to export above European consumers' right
to know what they are eating." Joseph Stiglitz, Making Globalization
Work, pg 129
Against the grain: 'Economics, not common sense, drives GM
crops'
Monsanto's
Harvest of Fear Vanity Fair 5/2008
Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele write for Vanity Fair, "Monsanto
already dominates America's food chain with its genetically modified
seeds. Now it has targeted milk production. Just as frightening as the
corporation's tactics - ruthless legal battles against small farmers -
is its decades-long history of toxic contamination."
Dr Michael Antoniou argues that genetically modified
crops are dangerous and
unnecessary
Interview by Nick Jackson The Independent, 27 September 2007
_http://news.independent.co.uk/education/higher/article2999527.ece_
(http://news.independent.co.uk/education/higher/article2999527.ece)
References from: Monsanto: Visionary or Architect of Bioserfdom? A
Global Socio-Economic Examination of Genetically Modified Organisms -
Andrew Hund 10dec99
Frankenwine?
Wines made with GMO yeast hit the market this year 20 Dec 2006 The
United States' first wines made using a genetically modified wine yeast
will be released this year, but critics say the GM yeast has not been
properly safety tested and could contaminate non-GM wine crops.